CC 03/01/1993 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COMMISSION March 1, 1993 Page 6 SIGNAGE, AND NUISANCE ABATEMENT; PROVIDING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES INCLUDING SITE PLAN REVIEW, SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; ESTABLISHING MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN STANDARDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS; ESTABLISHING A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; ESTABLISHING A BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; ESTABLISHING A CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD; ESTABLISHING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPMENT PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF COMPLETION; PROVIDING FOR VIOLATIONS, REMEDIES, AND PENALTIES; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR APPEALS; PROVIDING FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FINAL DECISIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES; PROVIDING FOR A GLOSSARY INCLUDING DEFINITION OF TERMS; REPEALING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 33 OF THE CITY OF CASSELBERRY, FLORIDA, PERTAINING TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 94, SAID ORDINANCE BEING STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND TREES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 132, SAID ORDINANCE BEING NOISE CONTROL; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 153, SAID ORDINANCE BEING LAND CLEARING; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 154, SAID ORDINANCE BEING SITE PLANNING; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 157, SAID ORDINANCE BEING THE ZONING CODE; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 158, SAID ORDINANCE BEING SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 159, SAID ORDINANCE BEING CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE. The Notice of Public Hearing relative to Ordinance 757 was published in the Orlando Sentinel on February 18, 1993. Mayor Hillebrandt asked if there was anyone in the audience that wished to speak either for or against Ordinance 757. The following individual came forward: 1) John Casselberry, 1140 Lancelot Way, suggested allowing approved site plans to be valid for a period of three years. Mr. McIntosh indicated that a three year period was too long. Mr. Casselberry stated he felt the building heights issue should be addressed separately from the Land Development Regulations so the public would have an opportunity to properly assess the matter.