Laserfiche WebLink
5. Commissioners should attempt to be brief and speak with relevancy to the motion being <br />discussed, avoiding repetitive comments or statements. <br />6. Debate should be fundamentally impersonal. All discussion should be addressed to the <br />Mayor as presiding officers and should not be directed to individual Commissioners. An <br />item may be discussed with vigorous support or opposition, but it is never appropriate <br />to attach the motives or character of another Commissioner either directly or by <br />innuendo or implication. It is the duty of the Mayor as presiding officer to immediately <br />stop such discussion from proceeding. If the Mayoras presiding officer fails to do so, <br />any other Commissioner may raise a point of order and call the Mayor's attention to the <br />speaker's misconduct. <br />7. A Commissioner that fails or refuses to speak in an orderly and courteous manner may <br />be denied the opportunity to speak and may be excluded from further participation in <br />the meeting by a majority vote of Commissioners in attendance. <br />TIME LIMITS ON DEBATE <br />1. There is no standard time limit for discussion during the debate of a motion. <br />2. Debate should ordinarily be kept within reasonable time limits by the Mayoras <br />presiding officer and generally confined to the subject matter under consideration. <br />3. If debate is to be limited, then each Commissioner shall be allocated equal time and <br />time allocated to one Commissioner shall not be transferred to another. <br />CUTTING OFF DEBATE <br />1. Most discussions should not be cut off until each Commissioner has had a full <br />opportunity to offer opinion and reasoning related to the issue being discussed. <br />2. However, if a Commissioner submits a motion to limit or end the debate, which is <br />seconded, it should be voted upon separately. If the motion to end or limit debate is <br />approved, the Commission shall then vote on the original motion that was the subject of <br />debate. <br />APPEAL OF A PROCEDURAL DECISION OF THE MAYOR <br />1. Purpose is to disagree with a procedural ruling of the Mayor and allow the Commission <br />to decide the disagreement by taking a vote. <br />2. The motion to appeal requires a second, and must be made at the time the ruling was <br />made by the Mayor. <br />3. The motion is debatable by the Commission. <br />4. The question to be decided is whether to sustain the Mayor's ruling. A majority or tie <br />vote sustains the decision of the Mayor. <br />Casselberry City Commission Code of Parliamentary Procedures <br />Adopted via Resolution 13 -2496 — May 13, 2013 <br />Page 14 <br />