CEB 04/12/2012 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MELTING APRIL 12, 2012 Ms. Bromaz~, Code Compliance Officer, advised the Board that his case is now in compliance and will zlot be heard. No motion was made, NEW C,A~SES Abandoned/neglected real pz•op,.erty, Art VI Chanter 58 Sec 6(a) ® CE~I 103007 142 Spoonhour Dr Mr, Brown, Code Compliance Supervisor, gave testimony foI• the above case, 1VIOTION: Mr, Smith moved to find Respondents in this case in violation of the City Code as charged and that Respondents correct the violation before 1:00 p,m, on 04/26/2012. In the event Respondent does lint cozx-ply by this date, a fine in the amouzlt of $50,00 pez• day will be imposed for each day the violation cantinues past the afaz•estated date, The Respondents az•e fiu•ther ordered to contact the Cade Compliance Officer to verify compliance with this Order, Mr, Herron seconded the motlon. The motion passed unanimously, Boat s /trailer s), City Cade Section 3-10.9 (2) ® CE-i2-00213 224 Bl'idle Path Mr, Rivera, Code Compliance Officer, gave testimony fol• the above case, Mike Webb, 224 Bridle Path, Casselberry stated he did get a notice on 2/4/12 and had nothing to do tivith the boat; it had to do with vehicle parked in unapproved area. Mr, Webb stated he I•eceived notice oz~ a different violation, and as far as lae knew on 2/4 there were no violations, He had been paI•king the work thick in the yard and was notified by a neighbor that would be a code violation, and then started parking the work truck iu the dz•lveway, Mr. Webb stated in reading the ordinance lae was sent he tivas not 100% sure he is in violation based on the copy of the code ]ze has. lYIOTION: Mr• Henson moved that this case be continued to the 05/10/2012 Code Enforcement Board Meeting, or to tlae next 1•eg111ar1y scheduled meeting, Mr. Herron seconded the motion, The motioxz passed unanimously, Desi lgilated„~arkin~, City Code Section 3-10.9 {A) (4) cE-12-00266 ~~a Bayou DI• Mr, Rivera, Code Compliance Officer, gave testimony for the above case. MOTI[Ol~l: Mr. Herron moved to find Respondent in this case in violation of the City Code as charged and that Respondent correct the violation before 1:00 p,m. on 04/26/2012, In the event Respondent does not comply by this date, a fine in the amou:zt of $25.00 per day will be imposed far each day the violation continues past. the aforestated date. The Respondent(s) is/are fiutlier oz•dez•ed to contact the Cade Compliance Officer to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Henson seconded the motion, The motion passed unanimously, Fence maintenance, City Code Sectiozt 3-10~ 4