Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment <br />January 26, 2012 <br />Page 3 <br />figures the site would be allowed 200 square feet of signage and if the building could be turned, the site would be <br />allowed 174 square feet of signage. He said Waffle House is only requesting 142 square feet of signage which is less <br />signage than is allocated for the site based on the building set back lines. Mr. Petersen said they are not requesting a <br />special privilege but the right to have adequate signage. <br />Mr. Petersen read the following portion of the City Code: "Premises notimproved with buildings. Anypremises <br />not improved wifh a building may display grounds signs with an aggregate sign area of two square feet for each linear <br />foof of building frontage which would be allowed to be developed under the Unified Land Development Regulations of <br />the City of Casselberry". Mr. Petersen said he could construct 200 square feet of signage on the vacant parcel; <br />however, if a business is constructed and operating on the site only 50 square feet of signage is allowed. <br />Mr. Petersen said that a hardship exists due to the location of the retention pond and it is an infill project. He <br />said the literal interpretation of the Code would deprive them of the right to have that signage forthe property and itwould <br />place an undue hardship on the property itself because of the lack of visibility and identity. He said that the property <br />remaining vacant causes an undue hardship on the property owner and the area. Mr. Petersen said 50 square feet of <br />signage for a business would be a severe disadvantage to any other business out there. <br />Mr. Petersen said a typical Waffle House sign package is about 240 square feet of signage and he is requesting <br />a 142 square feet of signage. He felt that 142 square feet was the minimum needed to move forward with the building to <br />make the investment to revitalize the site and feel that Waffle House would have an opportunity to compete against other <br />restaurants in the area. He said the reasonable use is defined if someone is willing to use the site. Mr. Petersen said it <br />is not injurious to the public welfare. He said the development regulations allow for at least 200 square feet of signage for <br />this particular property given the available building linear footage that could be built on that property. He said the future <br />land use plan calls out this particular property as a restaurant use. He said it is not detrimental to the welfare because it <br />is returning viability to a long vacant lot which could also provide a boost for the shopping center itself. Mr. Petersen said <br />that the shopping center is approximately 50% vacant, He said development of this site would also increase the property <br />values for the surrounding properties, increase jobs in the City and increase sales tax and property taxes, <br />Mr. Petersen said they are not using the typical architecture on the building because it is within the City's <br />Community Redevelopment District and due to that signage becomes more critical, He said that the Waffle House is a 24 <br />hour business and to be viable it needs to draw customers in during the hours when most businesses are closed. <br />