My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOA 12/01/2011 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Inactive Board Minutes
>
Board of Adjustment Minutes
>
BOA Minutes Archives
>
2011 BOA Minutes
>
BOA 12/01/2011 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2012 6:45:09 PM
Creation date
2/7/2012 6:44:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
12/1/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />December 1, 2011 <br />Page 3 <br />A general discussion ensued regarding the Administrative Official's Determination that was presented at the <br />August 25, 2011 Board of Adjustment meeting, the arches being utilized as a lighting feature, the loss of sales and the <br />alternative design option presented to City Staff. Ms. Scott explained that the alternative design option would be the very <br />last resort for Taco Bell as the arches are very important to their development. She said it is not desirable for the overall <br />design and the overall consistency of site. <br />Ms. Gauvin asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in opposition to the request. No one <br />came forward. <br />Ms. Gauvin asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of the request. No one <br />came forward. <br />Ms. Gauvin asked the applicant if she had anything further to add at this time. Ms. Scott said she had nothing <br />further to add to the discussion. <br />Mr. Guzman said there is nothing in the Unified Land Development Regulations that permits the Board of <br />Adjustment to take the loss of sales into consideration for appealing the Administrative Official's Determination. Mr. <br />Guzman said that the Board made a determination at the August 25, 2011 meeting that the arches met the definition of <br />signage and illumination does not play a part in determining signage, <br />Ms. Gauvin asked for a motion for BA 11-07. Mr. Guzman made a motion to uphold the Administrative Official's <br />Determination for BA 11-07. Ms. Wallace seconded the motion. <br />The Board was polled. <br />Mary Anne Gauvin Yes <br />Luis Guzman Yes <br />Phyllis Wallace Yes <br />Stanley Weinroth Yes <br />The motion passed unanimously. <br />Sixth Item of Business: Other Business <br />Ms. Smith stated that Ms. Wallace has resigned from the Board of Adjustment effective this evening. Ms, Smith <br />thanked Ms, Wallace for serving on the Board of Adjustment. <br />Ms, Smith explained that the Administrative Official has requested that appeals to the Administrative Official's <br />Determination duties be assigned to the Planning and Zoning Commission. She said the Planning and Zoning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.