My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOA 10/27/2011 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Inactive Board Minutes
>
Board of Adjustment Minutes
>
BOA Minutes Archives
>
2011 BOA Minutes
>
BOA 10/27/2011 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2012 6:44:12 PM
Creation date
2/7/2012 6:43:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
10/27/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of AdjusUnent <br />October 27, 2011 <br />Page 5 <br />Mr. Rosenthal said that earlier this year the shopping center declared bankruptcy because it can't support the <br />loan or the value of the property, Mr, Rosenthal said if Waffle House withdraws from the site, he is unsure what will <br />happen to the property in the future. <br />Mr, John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Casselberry felt that <br />the applicant was being burdened due to the narrowness of the frontage of the building, Mr. Casselberry felt that it was <br />better for the shopping center to have the narrow side of the out parcels towards the road because it provides a better <br />view of the shopping center. Mr. Casselberry suggested that the signage could be calculated based on a percentage of <br />the floor area of the building, <br />Mr, Guzman asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in opposition to the request. No <br />one came forward. <br />In response to the Board's question, Mr. Raasch stated that the applicant has the option to request a variance to <br />the signage or appeal the Board of Adjustment's decision. <br />Mr, Guzman asked the applicant to come forward, Mr. Peterson said the root of the problem is that staff <br />originally presented that the structure was allowed two square feet of copy area per linear foot of building frontage. Mr. <br />Peterson said the ordinance states that two square feet of copy area per linear foot of building frontage where the primary <br />entrance is located is allowed, He said that is a very important part of the language that is in the text that defines which <br />portion of the building frontage that needs to be used to determine copy area, Mr. Peterson said the root of the problem is <br />determining where the primary entrance is located defining how the signage should be calculated. He didn't feel there <br />was a need to go to the definition portion when it is defined in the context of the section, <br />After a brief discussion, Mr. Guzman asked for a motion for BA 11-08. Mr. McMullen made a motion to overturn <br />the Administrative Official's Determination, The motion failed due to the lack of a second, <br />Ms. Wallace made a motion to deny the appeal and uphold the Administrative Official's Determination for BA 11- <br />08. Mr. Weinroth seconded the motion, The motion passed with a majority vote with Mr. McMullen casting the dissenting <br />vote. <br />Seventh Item of Business: Other Business <br />There was no other business before the Board, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.