CC Minutes 03/14/2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CASSI;LBI;RRY CITY COMMISSION Minutes of March 14, 2011- Regular Meeting Page 9 of 13 08-21-30-300-0010-0000, OS-21-30-517-3100-012A, 08-21-30-300-OO1B-0000, 08-21-30-501-0000-0010, 05- 21-30-517-2800-0040, and OS-21-30-517-2800-0150, do not have voluntary petitions for annexation. In 2009, letters were sent to owners who did not have recorded annexation petitions for their properties. This annexation effort was to inform them that the City had received Petitions for• Annexation from some of the owners of their neighboring properties, as well as invite them to include their parcels into the City. Attachments included annexation agreements and tax calculation comparisons. Some of the parcels proposed for annexation include registered electors. Therefore, a referendum election posing the question of annexation for said parcels must be held. The subject properties are contiguous to the City hinits to the south and west. Properties to the north are in unincorporated Seminole County and the City of Longwood. The parcels are adjacent to commercial uses on the north, commercial and light industrial on the west, vacant undeveloped land on the south, and a lake body to the east. The subject properties have Seminole County future land use designations of Mixed Development, High Density Residential, and Commercial with Retail-Commercial and R-1 A zoning designations. Ordinance 11- 1346was approved on first reading by the City Commission on February 28, 2011. Ifthe ordinance is adopted by the City Commission, a referendum will be held by mail with ballots to be returned no later than June 14, 2011. If the referendum should fail, no attempt to annex the area may take place for a period of two years. Budget Impact: The properties are currently valued at $3,225,256 taxable value and currently provide $52,109 in county property tax. These parcels will provide $17,578 in City property tax, an estimated $7,376 in anmial stormwater fees and $2,294 for annual street lighting assessments. Recommendation: The City Manager and the Community Development Director recommended approval of Ordinance 11-1346 on second and final reading. Public Hearing: Mayor Glancy opened the public hearing relative to Ordinance 11-1346. No one came forward. Mayor Glancy closed the public hearing relative to Ordinance 11-1346. MOTION: Commissioner Solomon moved to approve and adopt Ordinance 11-1346 on second and final reading, as presented. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Hufford. Motion caI•ried unanimously by voice vote 5 - 0. 10® ~I A I F NANCE No items were scheduled on this agenda. 11. I+ S®I,LT'I'I®~TS No items were scheduled on this agenda. 1 'T E ITE S