BOA Minutes 11/19/2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustrnent November 19, 2609 Page 2 Swimming fool Variance Ms. Smith submitted a letter dated October 29,1009 (sic 2009) from the Lost Lake Estates HOA Inc. skating the Architectural Review Board approved the pool application (a copy is attached and made a part of the minutes}. Ms, Smith also submit#ed an email from Sentry Management dated November 18, 2009 stating lhatthe Architectural Review Board approved the request for the pool location; however, the fence location has not been reviewed (a copy of the email is attached and made a part of the minutes). Ms. Smitio said the variance application meets 1 0# the 6 criteria for granting the variance; therefore, Cily staff cannot fully support the request. She said if the Board of Adjustment chooses to grant the variance requested for BA 09- 06, for the property located at 831 Moonlit Lane, to allow a swimming pool and deck forward of the front building line, the motion should be based upon the Board of Adjustment's findings of fact and conclusions, the property site plan (Exhibit B), and the following conditions with the deletion of condition no. 2: 1, The variance shall only pertain to the proposed poolldeck shown in Exhibit B. A pool enclosure has not been requested or approved at this time. The installation of a pool enclosure (excluding the approved vinyl fence) shall require additional review and approval by the Board of Adjustment. 2: The a eewne~-Assesiat+on-prior te~ar~str~st+sn-e#-the-prepesed-{peel{desl~T~ie~19A~t~eri~atier~te-previded-wi~#e~+ld~tt per~i~appNsat~er~-s~haaitta~ 3. The poolldeck shall meet all other site development criteria, 4. A building permit for the poolldeck shall be obtained from the City's Building Safety Bureau within 60 days of the approval by the Board of Adjustment and the certificate of completion shall be obtained with 12D days of the issuance of the building permit, 5. All of the above conditions shall be fully and faithfully executed or the variance shall become null and void, f=ence Revision Variance Ms. Smith stated the variance appf ication meets 4 of the 6 criteria for granting the variance; therefore, City staff cannot fully support the request. She said if the Board of Adjustment chooses to grant the variance requested for BA 09- 06, for the property located at 831 Moonlit Lane, to allow a 6 foot tall fence forward of the front building line, the motion should be based upon the Board of Adjustment's findings of fact and conclusions, the property site plan (Exhibit 13j, and the following conditions: 1. The variance shall only pertain to the proposed fence shown in Exhibit B, 2. The fence shall match the vinyl material used for the existing fence on the property. 3. The fence may not be located in the existing landscape easement.