BOA Minutes 04/23/2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment April 23. 2009 Page 3 Ms. Gauvin asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of the request. No one came forward. Ms. Gauvin asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak against the request. Mr. Sam Hart, 161 South Triplet Lake Drive, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Hart said that the proposed shed could relocated without blocking the view. Mr. Hart said he did not see a hardship for granting the variance. After reviewing the criteria required for granting a variance, Ms. Gauvin asked for a motion for SA 09-01. Mr. McMullen made a motion to deny BA 09-01 variance application for 302 Triplet Lake Drive. Mr. Guzman seconded motion. The Board was polled. Mary Anne Gauvin Yes Earl McMullen Yes Luis Guzman Yes Arlin Armour Yes Andrew Lopez Yes The motion passed unanimously. Fifth Item of Business: BA 09.02: 609 laurel Wav/Demetra Blevins. Variance request to Article VII, Section 2-7.10 "Fences and walls" of the Casselberry Unified Land Development Regulations to allow a 6 foot tall vinyl privacy fence within a designated front yard. Ms. Gauvin asked the applicant to come forward. Ms. Demetra Blevins, 609 Laurel Way, Casselberry, Florida came forward. In response to the Chairman's question, the applicant requested that the City make their presentation at this time. Mr. Charles Senzee, Planner, reviewed the background information and the analysis ofthe request, provided in his memorandum to the Board of Adjustment, dated April 15, 2009 (a copy is on file in the Community Development Department). Mr. Senzee stated the variance application meets four of the six criteria for granting the variance; therefore, City staff cannot fully support the request. Mr. Senzee said if the Board of Adjustment chooses to grant the variance requested for BA 09-02, for the property located at 609 Laurel Way, to allow a fence within a designated front yard, the motion should be based upon the Board of Adjustment's findings of fact and conclusions, the property site plan attached to the staff report as Exhibit D, and the conditions outlined in the staff report which were: