My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes 12/08/2008
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2008 City Commisson Minutes
>
CC Minutes 12/08/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2009 1:14:38 PM
Creation date
1/20/2009 1:16:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
12/8/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of December 8, 2008 - Regular Meeting <br />Page 18 or24 <br /> <br />imposed notice required specified in F. S. 197.3632. If adopted, copies ofthe resolution must be sent to the <br />Seminole County Tax Collector, the Seminole County Property Appraiser and the Florida Department of <br />Revenue by January 10,2009. However, this resolution is non-binding and the City Commission may reduce <br />the areas covered by any future assessments or decide not to proceed with this assessment program at a later <br />date. Should the City Commission ultimately decide to implement non-ad valorem assessments in 2009, the <br />Commission has the option of not utilizing a uniform method of collection through the Property Appraiser's <br />Office and instead the City could directly bill residents and businesses, either in an annual bill or through <br />monthly billing utilizing either City billing resources or by contracting with a billing services firm. <br /> <br />Budget Impact: This item has no impact to the City Budget. <br /> <br />Recommendation: The City Manager and the Public Works Director recommended approval of Resolution <br />08-1967. <br /> <br />Public Hearing: The following individuals came forward and addressed Resolution 08-1967: <br /> <br />1) Mr. John Horvath, 1004 Bradford Drive, Winter Park, Unincorporated Seminole County, <br />stated he was speaking on behalf of his daughter who owns property in the City of <br />Casselberry. Mr. Horvath spoke in favor of Resolution 08-1967 because it frees up general <br />funds to pay for public safety expenses. <br /> <br />2) Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, spoke in opposition to Resolution 08- <br />1967. <br /> <br />No one else came forward. Mayor Glancy closed the public hearing relative to Resolution 08-1967. <br /> <br />MOTION: Vice Mayor Hufford moved to approve Resolution 08-1967, as <br />presented. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Solomon. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION: Commissioner Miller voiced concerns regarding Progress Energy not offering LED <br />light fixtures which would significantly decrease the City's street lighting costs, and <br />requested staff to continue to discuss the matter with Progress Energy. <br />Commissioner Miller and Vice Mayor Hufford stated they were only voting in favor <br />of the resolution in order to keep the option open and wanted to see the City push <br />Progress Energy to make the transition to LED light fixtures. Mr. Ed Torres, Public <br />Works Director, stated staff was researching possibly leasing light fixtures from <br />OUC for new lighting infrastructure at Lake Concord Park (Anniversary Park) <br />because it believed it might be more cost effective. Vice Mayor Hufford voiced <br />concerns regarding Progress Energy, and also stated she was supportive of possible <br />leasing light fixtures from OUC. Commissioner Solomon stated she has heard from <br />several citizens who want to have additional light fixtures and thought the proposed <br />fee was nominal. Vice Mayor Hufford clarified that the proposed assessment would <br />be utilized just to cover existing lighting and related expenses. Commissioner <br />Doerner voiced concerns regarding assessment fees when they are not utilized to <br />reduce costs and only utilized to free up general funds for other expenditures. <br />Commissioner Doerner stated she voted against this issue the last time and she <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.