PZ Minutes 09/27/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency September 27,2006 Page4of5 Mr. Van Meter suggested a performance bond should be obtained for the maintenance of the road. Mr. Kelley asked for a motion to address SP 06-02. Mr. Henson recommended continuing SP 06-02 to the call of the Chair. Mr. Weinroth seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. Fourth Item of Business: LPA 06-17: Growth Manaaement: Proportionate Fair-share Requirements. Amending ULDR Section 3-9.11, Concurrency Management, providing mitigation alternatives for development impacting constrained roadways. Ms. Sandra Smith, Acting Community Development Director, reviewed the information provided in her memorandum dated September 20,2006, to the City of Casselberry Planning and Zoning Commission (a copy is on file in the Community Development Department). Ms. Smith requested a favorable recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to the City Commission to adopt the Proportionate Fair-Share Mitigation Program. After a brief discussion, Mr. Kelley asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the request. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Casselberry said he did not read the staff report. Mr. Casselberry questioned the use of the term "mitigation" on the agenda. Mr. Henson gave a brief explanation of the Growth Management Proportionate Fair- share requirements. Mr. Casselberry expressed a concern with a fee structure that puts the land at a competitive disadvantage with neighboring governments. It was stated that the Growth Management Proportionate Fair-share is a state mandated requirement. Ms. Smith stated that the State provided the formula that would be utilized by the various jurisdictions to determine the fair-share. Mr. Kelley asked for a motion to address LPA 06-17. Mr. Parkhurst made a motion to accept LPA 06-17 the Growth Management Proportionate Fair-share requirements and pass it onto City Commission. Mr. Weinroth seconded the motion. Mr. Parkhurst amended his motion to recommend approval to the City Commission. Mr. Weinroth seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. Fifth Item of Business: Other Business. A discussion ensued regarding increasing the building height requirement and retail stores displaying goods outside.