PZ Minutes 10/25/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency October 25, 2006 Page 4 In response to the Commission's question regarding the development of the site and the amount of allowed signage , Ms, Smith said the Fifth Third parcel was originally developed as an outparcel from the shopping center. Mr, Kelley asked the applicant to come forward, Mr, Michael Steinback, Reynolds, Smith & Hill, 1715 North Westshore Boulevard, Tampa, Florida came forward, Mr, Steinback said the applicant is required to purchase the sidewalk as an encroachment on the property and it does not provide any value to the property and provides a public risk, He said the encroachment has forced the construction of the retaining walls. Mr, Steinback said the engineer has suggested reducing the bypass lane from 14 feet to 12 feet and use the additional 2 feet to increase the buffer width from 3 feet to 5 feet. He said the landscaping could be put along the western side of the property. Mr, Steinback said he cannot speak for the applicant regarding the reduction to the number of drive-through lanes, Mr. Kelley asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the request. Mr, John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr, Casselberry questioned if the bank parcel had cross access with the adjacent shopping center, A discussion ensued regarding the reduction of the drive-through lanes and landscaping. Mr, Burlingame made a motion to continue SPR 06-20 to the next meeting, Mr. Van Meter seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. Fourth Item of Business: Other Business. Ms, Smith; Acting Community Development Director, distributed a portion of the proposed Parking of Vehicle in Residential Districts Ordinance to the Planning and Zoning Commission (a copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Community Development Department), Ms, Smith said the proposed ordinance has been approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission; however it has not been approved by the City Commission. Ms, Smith said there have been questions asked at City Commission meetings and to staff regarding the designated parking areas and the intent of the proposed ordinance. Ms, Smith said Section 3-10.9A.3.F reads as follows: "An existing driveway or designated parking area which is unpaved and/or which is constructed without a permit, and that does