Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Community Redevelopment Agency <br />April 14, 2006 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />Mr. Hoffmann made a motion to approve the elevations for the proposed Cambridge Oaks <br /> <br />Retail/Office complex. Ms. Rodriguez seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice <br /> <br />vote. <br /> <br />In response to the Board's question, Mr. Hale estimated approximately two months to obtain all the <br /> <br />required permits to begin construction on the project. <br /> <br />Sixth Item of Business: Annual Report - review <br /> <br />Ms. Smith explained that the CRA requires an annual audit which is then forwarded to the <br /> <br />Department of Community Affairs, Florida Department of Financial Services, Seminole County Board of <br /> <br />County Commissioners, and the City Commission for their review. Mr. Daigle said he reviewed and revised <br /> <br />the first page of the report with Mr. Wells. Mr. Daigle made a motion to approve the CRA annual audit and <br /> <br />forward it on to the proper authorities. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Ms. Smith reviewed the financials <br /> <br />on page 3 of the report. Ms. Smith stated that the figures in the report are based on the 2005 fiscal year. <br />Ms. Smith stated she would provide the current CRA budget figures at the next meeting. The motion <br /> <br />passed unanimously by voice vote. <br /> <br />Seventh Item of Business: Public Comment <br /> <br />Mr. Daigle asked for public comments. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost lake Lane, <br />Casselberry came forward. Mr. Casselberry questioned if there is a septic tank on the Cambridge Oaks <br /> <br />property. <br /> <br />Mr. Hank Lander, 445 Surrey Run, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Lander asked if there <br />would be any changes to the city center and civic center due to the change in leadership at the City. Ms. <br />Smith explained that the City has a timeline with Unicorp regarding the contract and a site plan review and <br />plat must be approved before November 30, 2006. Ms. Smith stated that the City is prepared to move <br /> <br />forward with the project. <br />Mr. Lander asked if the restricted height of 35 feet would impact the appraised value for the <br />Concord Center property and is there a process in place to increase the allowed height. Ms. Smith <br />explained that a residential use project at the Concord Center property would require a zoning change from <br />