BOA Minutes 05/25/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment May 25,2006 Page 2 variance request for BA 06-04, for the property located at 41 0 Diane Court, for a 5-foot encroachment into a required rear yard building setback, creating a 15-foot rear yard in lieu of the required 20-foot rear yard; the motion should be based upon the Board of Adjustment's findings of fact and conclusions, the property site plan (Exhibit B) dated May 31, 1988, and the following conditions: 1. The variance shall only pertain to the proposed addition. 2. A building permit for the addition shall be obtained from the City's Building Safety Bureau within 60 days of the approval by the Board of Adjustment and a final inspection shall be obtained with 180 days of the issuance of the building permit. 3. All of the above conditions shall be fully and faithfully executed or the variance shall become null and void. In response to the Board's question, Mr. Dorsten stated that the Code does not allow for an expansion to a non- conforming use. The required size of the garage was discussed briefly. After a brief discussion, Mr. Billerbeck asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Scott Brasol explained that the garage would meet the required size. Mr. Brasol stated he is part owner in a custom renovations business and assured the Board that the project would be completed in a timely manner. Mr. Billerbeck asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of the request. Mr. Scott Hudson, 785 Diane Circle, Casselberry, Florida came forward to speak in favor of the request. Mr. Hudson had no objection to the construction of the proposed addition. Ms. Fran Sullivan, 400 Diane Court, Casselberry, Florida came forward to speak in favor of the request. Ms. Sullivan stated any improvements Mr. Brasol makes to his home is an improvement to the neighborhood. Mr. Tim Sullivan, 400 Diane Court, Casselberry, Florida came forward to speak in favor of the request. Mr. Tom Erskine, 420 Diane Court, Casselberry, Florida came forward to speak in favor of the request. Mr. Erskine stated he had no objection to improving the neighborhood. Mr. Billerbeck asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in opposition to the request. No one came forward. There were no general comments or closing statements from the applicant or the City. After a brief discussion, Mr. Billerbeck asked for a motion for BA 06-04. Mr. Miller made a motion to approve BA 06-04 conforming to the City's criteria number 1 and number 6 and the following: 1. Criteria number 2 -It is not a condition created by the applicant because it existed prior to purchase to the property. The structure had been in place since 1979.