My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CEB Minutes 01-10-2008
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Code Enforcement Hearing Minutes
>
CEB Minutes Archives
>
2008 CEB Minutes
>
CEB Minutes 01-10-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2008 10:24:28 PM
Creation date
8/31/2008 10:23:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
1/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CITY OF CASSELBERRY <br />CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING <br />January 10,2008 PAGE 6 <br /> <br />does not have jurisdiction over construction, placing <br />area, Ms. Wallace had issued a construction type permit for the <br />no prohlem with the hatTier wall retaining dirt along water <br />pennitted by FDEP or required to be built to that extent by FDEP. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion. <br /> <br />. Ruf stated a pennit would be needed to construct the retaining wail on the uplands <br />Casselberry, which he did not do. <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />Charles Senzee, planner for Community Development, City CassclbclTY stated that his department would not <br />have an issue with the side walls in their current condition since it does not above the CUlTent <br />From the Public Works perspective he has raised the elevation of his yard, this would require review. Mr. <br />Senzee stated he could not say it would be approved or denied based on their standards. When this type of thing <br />is done now they have to look at where the water would go when it rains, and that Public Works would have to <br />approve or deny the permit. <br /> <br />Discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Hcnderson asked why there was no one from public \Vorks present at this hcaling. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruf stated he did not anticipate the need for that Department, and that just about every other Depar1ment <br />was present at the hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Henderson asked ifhe applies for a pemlit for the side wall, since it is already there \vill the City of <br />CasselbelTY give him the pem1it. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruf stated he thought the best way to handle this would be the way 212 Caniage Hill Drive was handled, <br />try to make application and see what they say. <br /> <br />Discussion. <br /> <br />Debra Babb-Nutcher, Assistant City Attomey advised the board. <br /> <br />Discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruf gavc testimony. <br /> <br />Discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruf gave testimony. <br /> <br />Ms. Babb-Nutcher asked what the City is issuing the violation for in regard to the side wall, is it failure to get a <br />building pennit? <br /> <br />Mr. Ruf stated that was correct. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.