Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Slolsinesses", Peter R. Hesht, Ph.D. (1998); <br /> <br />(b) Findinas. Based on evidence concernino the adverse secondarv effects of <br />g,QlJlt entertainment establishmentslsexuallv oriented businesses on the communili' <br />Dresented in hearinos and in reoorts made available to the City Commission. and on <br />findinos. interoretations. and narrowino constructions incoroorated in numerous <br />cases includino. but not Ij(l'lited to City of Renton v. Plavtime Theaters. Inc.. 475 <br />U.S. 41 (1986): Youna v. American Mini Theaters. 426 U.S. 50 (1976): FW/PBS. <br />Inc. v. City of Dallas. 493 U.S. 215 (1990): California v. La Rue. 409 U.S. 109 <br />U 972): New York State Liauor Auth. V. Bellanca. 452 U,S. 714 (1981): Barnes v. <br />Glen Theater. Inc.. 501 U.S. 560 (1991): City of Erie v. PaD's A.M., 120 S. Ct. 1382 <br />(2000): City of Los Anaeles v. Alameda Books. 535 U.S. 425 (2003): City of Littleton <br />v. Z.J. Gifts. LLC. 541 US 774 (2004): Sammv'sofMQbile. Ltd. v. CitvofMobile.140 <br />F. 3d 993 (11'0 Cir. 1998): Artistic Entertainment. Inc. V. City of Warner Robbins. <br />223 F. 3d 1306 (11th Cir. 20~3); Peek-A-BooLounae of Braden ton. Inc. v. Manatee <br />County. ~37 F. 3d 1306 (11 Cir. 2003); Garv v. City of Warner Robbins. 311 F. 3d <br />1334 (11 0 Ci~ 2002); Wise Enters v. Unified Gov't of Athens-Clarke County. 217 F. <br />3d 1360 (11 Cir. 2000); Ward v. County of Granae. 217 F. 3d 1 ~O (11 In Cir, <br />2000); Boss CaDital. Inc. v. City of Casselberrv. 187 F. 3d \f51 (110 Cir. 1999); <br />David Vincent. Inc. v. Broward County. 200 F. 3d 1325 (1 r Cir. 2000); Ladv J. <br />Linaerie. Inc. v. City of Jacksonville. 176 F. 3d 1358 (11 In Cir. 1999); Ladv J. <br />Linaerie. Inc. v. City of Jacksonville. 973 F. Su~~. 1428 (M.D. Fla. 1997); Grand <br />Faloon Tavern. Inc. v. Wicker. 670 F. 2d 943 (11 Cir. 1 ~82); International Food & <br />Beveraae Svstems v. Ft. Lauderdale. 7~4 F. 2d 1520 (11 Cir. 1986); Ben=s Barv. <br />Villaae of Somerset. 316 F. 3d 702 (7' Cir. 2003); City of Davtona Beach v. Del <br />P~cio 476 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 1985): BZAPs. Inc. v. City of Man~~to. 268 F. 3d 603 <br />(8 Cir. 2001); SOB. Inc. v. County of Benton. 317 F. 3d 856 (8 n Cir. 2003): World <br />Wide Video of Washinaton. Inc. v. City of SDokane. 368 F. 3d 1186 (91n Cir. 2004); <br />Gammoh v. City of La Habra. 395 F. 3d 1114 (91n Cir. ~005); Seminole <br />Entertainment. Inc. v. City of Casselberrv. 813 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 5 DCA 2002\. rev. <br />denied835 So. 2d 269 (2002). cert. denied 123 S. Ct. 2276. 71 USLW 3641 (2003) <br />(includino excerots of the record Dresented to the Casselberrv City Commission and <br />the order of the City Commission revokino Rachel's adult entertainment license): <br />McKee v. City of Casselberrv. 10 Fla. L. Weeklv Suoo. 4Q8a. Per curium Affirmed <br />2004 WL 1178246 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004\. cert. denied 125 S. Ct. 454 (2004) and <br />21her cases: anq on materials and reoorts of adverse secondarv effects occurrino in <br />and around sexuallv oriented businesses in other communities includino. but not <br />limited to. New York, New York: City of Houston Ordinance Number 97-75: <br />Phoenix. Arizona: Tqledo. Ohio: Kennedale. Texas: Dallas. Texas: Sioux City. IA~ <br />Newoort News. Viroinia: Tucson. Arizona: St. Paul, Minnesota: Minneaoolis, <br />Minnesota: Houston. Texas: Indianaoolis. Indiana: Amarillo. Texas: Garden Grove. <br />California: Los Anoeles. California: Austin. Texas: Macon-Bibb County. Georaia: <br />Palm Beach County. Florida: Manatee County. Florida: the findinos of the Attornev <br />Ordinance No. 06-1201 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />