Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br /> <br /> 4 <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 <br /> <br /> 8 <br /> <br /> 9 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />13 <br />14 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />19 <br />20 <br /> <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />27 <br />28 <br /> <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br /> <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br /> <br />CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of April 14, 2003 - Special Meeting/Workshop <br />VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT <br />Page 2 of 79 <br /> <br />BRUCE PRONOVOST: This evening we have on our agenda, is really the second in a series, <br />or actually probably the third in a series of workshops and special meetings that we've had with <br />regard to who shall provide electric service to the City of Casselberry. As for members of the <br />audience who may not be aware; the City of Casselberry has had a franchise agreement with <br />Florida Power Corporation which expired in 2001. Although the City and Florida Power entered <br />into negotiations around 97/98, those negotiations were not successful in producing another <br />fi.anchise agreement. While those negotiations were going on, there became a stumbling block <br />with a key clause in the contract which was the purchase option at the end of the thirty year <br />franchise agreement, the City had the option to purchase the system, and certainly that's a pretty <br />significant asset. And the stumbling block with the City was where Florida Power's position was <br />that clause in the contract was, would not be in the future contract, and when the City asked the <br />question what will we get for not having that in return for giving up that asset, the answer was <br />nothing and in fact the clause in the contract was; Florida Power would not adhere to that. So, <br />some litigation ensued. The long of the short is the City prevailed with those law; in that <br />litigation, at considerable expense to the City and determined that the price of the system would <br />be 22.3 million dollars. Now, the City has undertaken several goals. One, on behalf of its <br />citizens, the first goal is how can we improve Casselberry? How can we ensure that our citizens <br />are paying a fair, equitable rate for high quality service? And of course now we're into the <br />system with litigation costs and we've also requested that the City be made whole. We had <br />another workshop about a month ago. We had proposals fi.om private enterprises who had an <br />interest in providing electric service to the City. Those private enterprises were one, Florida <br />Power, and also a company out of California, ENCO, who made proposals to the City. This <br />evening, we are going to hear presentations from municipally owned utilities. Kissimmee <br />Utilities and also Orlando Utilities Commission. And after that we'll have a staff presentation, <br />almost a decision tree, if you will, in terms of what are the options that are available to the City <br />and then we can move forward with that. So, having said all that, the first presenter will be <br />Kissimmee Utility Authority. <br /> <br />KEN DAVIS: Mr. Mayor and Commissioners, thank you for the opportunity to be here tonight. <br />I'd like to start; my name is Ken Davis. I'm Vice President of Engineering and Operations with <br />KUA and I'd like to extend apologies fi.om our President and General Manager, Jim Welch, <br />which was, who was unable to be here tonight due to a prior commitment. Since Jim's not here, <br />I'll be pretty much giving most of the presentation, but we did bring along Ben Sharma, which is <br />our Vice President of Power Supply, will talk briefly about some power supply options. Mike <br />Geraghty, our Vice President of Customer Service and Marketing will talk about some of the <br /> <br /> <br />