Laserfiche WebLink
Police/Fire Pension Board Meeting <br />November 17, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />Salary increases recognized averaged only 2.9%. The actuarial assumption was 6% so the actual <br />increase was very good for the plan. The future value that would be needed to pay for all future <br />benefits would be $14,763,232. The actuarial value at fiscal yearend was $6,854,844. The <br />difference, $7,908,388, is what remains to be funded. The funding is scheduled over multiple <br />years which is how the actuary determines the funding requirement each year. The prior year <br />administrative expenses are also built into the next year's funding requirement. <br />The excess state monies reserve is $1,105,965 at fiscal yearend. There was no special fire <br />distribution for FY 2009. <br />The funding standard account tracks excess contributions where the City has access to that when <br />the City may need to draw from it during tight budget years. The balance in the case of the City <br />of Casselberry was created from perhaps excess state contributions. Patrick is not certain that the <br />balance may be restricted to fund future benefits. If the City were to "short fund" the plan in a <br />year to take advantage of the money in the Funding Standard Account ($163,372 at 9/30/09) it <br />will not affect the balance of money held in the Excess State Monies Reserve. <br />Mr. Donlan leads a discussion about the "Stop Restart" ordinance next. In 1996 a one-time opt <br />out was offered to leave the Florida Retirement System. The City opted out and for a few <br />employees the City collected more than enough from excise taxes to pay for current benefits. In <br />1999 the law was changed to require that excess state money over the frozen amount must be <br />used to pay for benefit enhancements. Frozen contributions do not change with raises in salaries <br />or increased membership. There is a method to change the frozen amount through something <br />called a "Stop Restart" ordinance. The City would reduce benefits to perhaps a 2% multiplier <br />compared to 3% now in effect. With the reduction in benefits the frozen state funding would be <br />reset at zero. Then the City passes a "benefit improvement" which reestablishes pre-existing <br />benefits. The frozen amount is reset also at a higher amount reflecting higher current salaries and <br />larger membership. It is legal and Patricia Shoemaker (with the Division of Retirement) has <br />approved it. <br />If a Stop Restart ordinance is implemented the current frozen amount ($183,117) is reset at <br />something higher. To the extent that State money exceeds the new frozen amount it can be <br />shared through a Share Plan. The Stop Restart could reduce plan benefits as far a State minimum <br />with corresponding frozen amount at zero. It's also possible to reset what was in place for the <br />plan in 1999 with a corresponding frozen amount calculated for that level. By implementing a <br />Stop Restart future distributions to members could be impacted. It is possible to engineer the <br />Stop Restart ordinance to go down to any level like a 2.9% multiplier instead of 3%. The affect <br />would be to moderate the change that would be authorized to the frozen amount by enacting a <br />Stop Restart ordinance. <br />Trustee William Jensen asked if the balance of excess state monies would be affected by the <br />passage of a Stop Restart ordinance. Would there be fewer dollars available at the inception of a <br />Share plan for distribution to members? If the Stop Restart is enacted to the fullest extent <br />possible then the City will be able to use all State monies for quite a while and there would be no <br />money available for distribution to Share Plan members. If the City and the members wanted to <br />do a Share Plan somewhere in between there may be something left for Share distribution. <br />East Naples Fire District passed a Stop Restart and a Share Plan. In the case of East Naples the <br />excess state monies was drawn down to pay for a multiplier increase. If no multiplier increase is <br />enacted for Casselberry then the excess state money would be used to seed the Share Plan. <br />In the end given no other benefit enhancements the order of implementation does not matter. If <br />the Share Plan is implemented first the Excess State Monies Reserve would be applied to share <br />