My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02/24/2021 Minutes (Pre-Planning Budget Workshop)
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2021 City Commission Minutes
>
CC 02/24/2021 Minutes (Pre-Planning Budget Workshop)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2021 9:27:20 AM
Creation date
4/13/2021 9:27:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Workshop
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
2/24/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of February 24, 2021 — Pre -Budget Planning Workshop <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />First approach — increase to $22.47 per month, approximately 22% <br />Second approach — first increase to $21.74 per month, approximately 18%; second increase <br />to $23.25 per month, approximately 7% <br />Third approach — gradual increases with the first being 14% and then yearly incremental <br />increases of 2 3/ %, ending at $24.05 per month <br />Discussion: A lengthy discussion ensued which included: the advantages and disadvantages of each of the <br />three approaches and the approximate fund balances at the end of the six years left in the contract period; the <br />unknowns of negotiating a new contract for solid waste services; the fact that since solid waste collection <br />billing is included in the utility bills, customers may have the perception that the utility rates have increased; <br />the fact that the City had not raise solid waste rates in ten years; option three with gradual increases would <br />most likely have less of an impact on customers giving them the ability to adjust over time; rates should be <br />reviewed every year or two to alleviate the need for a large increase at one time; the importance of providing <br />information to customers explaining the need for the increase, that there has not been an increase in 10 years <br />and the rate they are being charged is actually less than what the service costs; historical reasons for the City <br />having started providing solid waste collection services; and the current recycling program and the need to <br />educate the customers about what is recyclable and what is not. <br />The Commission as a whole felt that the third option would be best for the customers overall and would be <br />less of a burden on them than a large increase at one time. Mr. Newlon advised he would be developing <br />legislation to bring to the City Commission in the near future to authorize these pricings, and he would work <br />with staff to develop an information campaign to explain to customers why an increase is necessary. <br />B. Brightwater <br />City Manager Randy Newlon gave a presentation on Brightwater, which included the following: <br />- Brightwater is the family home of founder Hibbard Casselberry. It was designed and built in <br />1953 by famed architect James Gamble Rogers. <br />- Brightwater is a two-story home with approximately 7,000 square feet in area. It fronts the <br />shore of South lake Triplet with a view of the Casselberry Golf Course to the west. <br />- Located at 700 S. Lost Lake Lane, the house sits on land of 8.9 acres in the center of the City <br />of Casselberry. <br />- The City owns a parcel north of the Brightwater Estate. It is just over 3 acres and part of it <br />functions as part of the golf course. <br />- The City owns a parcel south of the Brightwater Estate. It is just under 3 acres and almost <br />half is lake bottom. If all combined, there may be approximately 12 acres that could be <br />programmed. <br />- The Brightwater property is owned by the Estate of John Casselberry. It was offered for sale <br />to the City in 2019. It was desired to preserve the estate for posterity and add it to the City's <br />park system. <br />- The City commission authorized the City Manager to negotiate with the Estate. Two <br />appraisals were obtained to inform the negotiations. <br />- The home is in disrepair and deemed to add no value. The approach taken for the appraisals <br />was to value according to its highest and best use. That was to subdivide and redevelop with <br />multiple single-family homes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.