Laserfiche WebLink
personal beliefs for vague and artificial ones." Id. at 1822. Further, the Court stated: "Once it <br />invites prayer into the public sphere, government must permit a prayer giver to address his or her <br />own God or gods as conscience dictates." Id. at 1822; and <br />WHEREAS, this City Commission is not establishing a policy that defines the <br />constitutional limits for permissible public invocations; rather, this City Commission intends to <br />adopt guidelines that are consistent with the guidance provided by several courts that have <br />considered the validity of public invocations; and <br />WHEREAS, numerous courts have approved an invocation practice that incorporates a <br />neutral system to invite religious leaders from the local community and volunteers to provide an <br />invocation before public meetings. Town of Greece; see also Simpson v. Chesterfield Cmy. Bd. <br />of Supervisors, 404 F.3d 276 (4th Cir. 2005), cert denied, 546 U.S. 937 (2005); Pelphrey v. Cobb <br />Cnty., 547 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2008); Rubin v. City of Lancaster, 710 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. <br />2013); and <br />WHEREAS, the City Commission intends to adopt a policy that does not proselytize or <br />advance any particular faith, or show any purposeful preference for one religious view to the <br />exclusion of others; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Commission intends to adopt a policy that will not demonstrate a <br />purposeful preference for one religious view over another by not permitting the faith of the <br />person offering the invocation to be considered when extending an invitation or scheduling <br />participation; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Commission provides all of its citizens, regardless of their <br />religious beliefs, the free and equal benefits of citizenship, invites all leaders of all religious <br />assemblies to volunteer to give a public meeting invocation, does not discriminate against <br />anyone on the basis of their participation or non -participation in a public meeting invocation, <br />encourages all invocation speakers to be respectful of those who may hold different religious <br />beliefs, and prohibits invocations that intentionally proselytize or disparage any person, religion, <br />or religious sect; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Commission believes that clergy that serve the local community <br />are peculiarly suited through training, tradition, and public service to petition for divine guidance <br />upon the deliberations of the City Commission, and to accomplish the City Commission's <br />objective to solemnize public occasions, express confidence in the future, and to encourage the <br />recognition of what is worthy of appreciation in society. See Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, <br />693 (1984); and <br />WHEREAS, in further recognition of the diversity of ideas, viewpoints, and various <br />beliefs and non -beliefs held within this Country, it is the policy of the City that the opening <br />invocation and recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance be voluntary and allow participation from <br />all that wish to participate, but otherwise allow non -participation and an opportunity to exit the <br />City Commission Chambers during the opening invocation or recitation of the Pledge of <br />Allegiance to any who do not wish to witness or participate in same; and <br />2 <br />