My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PZ 09/14/2016 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
>
P & Z Minutes Archives
>
2016 P & Z Minutes
>
PZ 09/14/2016 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2017 9:24:23 AM
Creation date
2/9/2017 9:24:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
9/14/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Commission/ <br />Local Planning Agency <br />September 14, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />PowerPoint Presentation is attached and made a part of the minutes). Ms. Hanna said the variance application <br />meets all six (6) criteria for granting the variance; therefore, staff supports the variance request as presented. <br />Ms. Hanna said if the Planning and Zoning Commission chooses to grant the sports lighting pole height <br />variance, BA 16-02, for property located on Seminola Boulevard within the Legacy Park Planned Development, the <br />motion should be based upon the Planning and Zoning Commission's findings of fact and conclusions, the staff <br />report dated September 14, 2016, the property site plan (Exhibit C), and the following conditions: <br />1. The sports lighting pole heights may not exceed 80 feet as provided in Table 1. <br />2. Lights shall be turned off immediately after a sporting event, or at 10:00 pm, whichever comes first. <br />3. All of the above conditions shall be fully and faithfully executed or the variance shall become null and void. <br />heights. <br />A brief discussion ensued regarding light trespass, the angles of the light fixtures and the difference in pole <br />Mr. Henson asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Jay Klima, Klima Weeks Civil Engineering, 385 <br />Douglas Avenue, Altamonte Springs, Florida came forward. In response to the Commission's question, Mr. Klima <br />said that the new lighting locations reduce the amount of light that needs to be cast on the tennis courts. <br />Mr. Henson asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, <br />the request. Ms. Dori Sutter, 234 Morton Lane, Winter Springs, Florida came forward. Ms. Sutter said her property <br />abuts Geneva School on the east and expressed concerns with light trespass and esthetics. She questioned if the <br />40' poles could be used on the entire site. Mr. Henson explained the City Code regarding light trespass to the <br />adjacent properties. <br />Ms. Sutter said the tree line is the only buffer for the houses on the Winter Springs side and appreciated the <br />developer maintaining the natural buffer. Ms. Sutter said the tree line is much lower adjacent to the tennis courts and <br />was concerned with the light poles exceeding the tree line. Mr. Henson explained that the site meets the City Code <br />for light trespass. <br />Mr. Richard Dixon, 251 Morton Lane, Winter Springs, Florida came forward. Mr. Dixon made a correction to <br />the staff report on page 9, paragraph 2, stating the sports field light poles should not exceed 80'. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.