My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes 04/12/2013 SP Workshop
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2013 City Commission Minutes
>
CC Minutes 04/12/2013 SP Workshop
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2022 6:23:32 PM
Creation date
10/17/2013 1:57:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Workshop
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
4/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBPRRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of April 12, 2013 — Strategic Planning workshop <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />community response would make it feasible to add additional linear <br />parks in other areas of the City. Staff was directed to bring their <br />findings and recommendation, including rezoning options and <br />information on grant programs, for consideration by the Commission <br />at a future meeting. <br />The ineeting was recessed at 12: 07p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 12:41p.nz. <br />6. FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES <br />Presentation: Mr. Newlon presented a list of goals and objectives to the Commission for Fiscal Year <br />2013/2014, explaining that the goals were general goals that would cavy on beyond next year, followed by a <br />series of objectives related to each goal which would be pursued in the next fiscal year. He stated that the <br />goals included the following: safety; efficient and effective government operations; a strong local economy; <br />sustainable and livable neighborhoods; increased mobility; and clean, safe and efficient public utilities ad <br />facilities. He invited discussion from the Commissioners concerning these goals and the related objectives <br />contained in their packets, in addition to any concerns or suggestions for additional goals and objectives they <br />may have had. A copy of the list of Goals and Objectives is attached to and made a part of these <br />minutes. <br />Discussion: A lengthy discussion ensued regarding topics related to the goals and objectives, including <br />neighborhood improvements; increased mobility including trails and F1exBus; possible consolidation of public <br />safety services; City Center development process and progress; annexation; possibility of a joint planning <br />agreement with the County; acquisition of property for economic development and connectivity purposes; and <br />intergovernmental relations. <br />CONSENSUS: There was a consensus by the Commission to direct staff to look into <br />available properties in the areas surrounding the SunRail station for <br />possible acquisition by the City. Ms. Smith advised she would be able <br />to provide information regarding any available properties, and would <br />also provide information on annexation regulations and strategies. <br />In response to questions fi•om the Commission, Mr. Newlon gave a brief update on the status of the City <br />Center, advising that staff was still working with the developers and attorneys on the developer's agreement. A <br />brief discussion followed regarding concerns about possible relocation of the sculpture center from the old fire <br />house, and building material standards for both construction of the City Center and other developments city- <br />wide. There was additional discussion regarding possible branding strategies for the City; connectivity; and <br />future multi modal improvements along State Road 436. <br />Commissioner Fry suggested the possibility of an earlier meeting time for regular Commission meetings in <br />order to more fully engage the business community and to make more efficient use of city staff time. A lengthy <br />discussion ensued regarding statutory requirements for public hearings; agenda format issues; and methods of <br />notification to the public should a change occur. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.