Laserfiche WebLink
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of November 26, 2012 — workshop <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />City Manager Randy Newlon stated that the City had established various impact fees in the past which were <br />charges for development within the City, and which included municipal impact fees which benefited the Police <br />and Fire Departments; recreation impact fees for parks; and road impact fees for roads with the City. He <br />explained that these fees need to be reviewed from time to time to ensure they were still justified, and once <br />substantiated, to measure the valuation of what the fees should be. He advised that Tindale - Oliver & <br />Associates had been hired to perform this review of the City's impact fees and determine whether changes <br />were needed. He further advised that representatives of the firm would be giving a presentation which would <br />be an overview to orient the Commission about impact fees, including what they are, how they are established, <br />and the approach that would be taken to perform the review of the City's impact fees. <br />Mr. Newlaon explained that the final report would be presented to the Commission at a later time and they <br />were not asking for any kind of policy guidance at this time. Mr. Newlon then introduced Mr. Steve Tindale, a <br />principle of Tindale - Oliver and Associates, and Ms. Nilgun Kamp, Project Manager for the impact fee <br />assessment study. <br />Ms. Kamp gave a presentation covering the background of the City's impact fees; the purpose ofthe study and <br />the study schedule; an overview of impact fees and legal requirements; the methodology for conducting the <br />study; and the goals for and additional benefits of the study. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation is <br />attached to and made a part of these minutes. <br />Discussion: Discussion ensued between the Commission, Ms. Kamp and Mr. Steve Tindale regarding legal <br />requirements; road impact fees vs. multi -modal impact fees; standards and levels of service; city standards vs. <br />rural area standards; efficiencies; defensibility of the fees; and various options for structuring the fees. <br />Commissioner Aramendia requested that a list of the impact fees that have been charged by the City be <br />provided to the Commission when the presentation is made, to be used for comparison between what has been <br />charged in the past and what is being proposed. Vice Mayor Solomon suggested it would also be a good idea <br />to have a list from some other cities in the area for comparison. <br />At the conclusion of the discussion, Mr. Tindale and Ms. Kamp commended City staff on their part in the <br />process, stating they had done a tremendous job collecting data and following up with them with requested <br />items. <br />Mayor Glancy and the Commissioners agreed the City had an outstanding staff. She thanked Mr. Tindale and <br />Ms. Kamp for the presentation. <br />