CC Minutes 12/10/2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION Minutes of December 10, 2012 — Regular Meeting Page 13 of 19 Budget Impact: This UWHC Agreement is for an amount not to exceed $1,153,389 unless the scope of the project changes. The funds associated with this item must be disbursed to FDOT within 30 calendar days prior to the date on which FDOT advertises the Project for bids. $400,000 is currently available in the FY 2013 Renewal & Replacement Fund infrastructure account #402 -0751- 536.63 -40 and the remaining balance due to FDOT of $753,389 is provided in the same account on the submitted Budget Amendment #13 -018, providing for a transfer from the Utility Fund #402. BA #13 -018 Explanation of Request: This item seeks City Commission approval to provide funding for costs associated with utility relocation work related to the Highway 17 -92 and SR 436 Flyover Project. This budget amendment will provide sufficient funding of an additional $753,3 89 necessary for the City to execute a Utility Work by Highway Contractor Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation, in an amount not to exceed $1,153,389 without prior authorization. $400,000 was previously budgeted in the FY 2013 budget. Account Number Account Description Amount Increase: 401- 0000 - 389.90 -00 Water & Sewer Fund Balance $753,389 402 - 0751 - 536.63 -40 New Water Lines /Infrastructure $7533389 402 - 0000 - 381.01 -00 Interfund Transfer /Transfer from 401 $753,389 401- 0190 - 536.94 -02 R R & B fund /Transfer to 402 $753,389 Recommendation: The City Manager and the Public Works Director recommended approval of Resolution 12 -2444 and related Budget Amendment #13 -018. Audience Input: The following individuals came forward to address Resolution 12 -2444. Mayor Glancy reminded Mr. Fraleigh that the parliamentary procedures in place did not allow disruptive behavior. She stated that his behavior was often disturbing and disruptive and encouraged him to adjust his delivery to a more respectable tone and to stay on point. She advised if he chose not to do this he would be asked to stop speaking and be seated. She further advised that if he chose to argue with either her or any of the Commissioners she would ask the City Manager to have him removed from the meeting. 1. Mr. James Fraleigh, 23 Teresa Court, voiced opposition to Resolution 12 -2444. He voiced concerns about there not being a bid process, stating he believed the bid process was helpful in preventing scams. He also stated he felt the flyover project should be reevaluated as to whether it was needed, and expressed concerns about the effect it would have on local businesses in that area. 2. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, suggested that research should be done to see about the possibility of the state contributing to the cost of relocation of the utilities. No one else came forward.