CEB 09/13/2012 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

entitled to recover its reasonable costs of such services. Mr. Bakalla seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Overgrown property, ULDR Section, 3 -10.3 - repeat violation ® CE -12 -01322 676N Winter Park Dr Mr. Brown, Code Compliance Supervisor, gave testimony for the above case. MOTION: Mr. Smith moved to find Respondent(s) in this case was /were in repeat violation of City Code as charged based on the Board's prior order entered against the same Respondent for the same violation. The Respondent brought the property into compliance on 09/13/2012. A fine in the amount of $3,100 is hereby imposed for 31 of repeat violation. Mr. Bakalla seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Overgrown property, ULDR Section, 3 -10.3 - repeat violation ® CE -12 -01337 365 Imperial Dr Mr. Leonard, Code Compliance Officer, gave testimony for the above case. MOTION: Mr. Smith moved to find Respondent(s) in this case was /were in repeat violation of City Code as charged based on the Board's prior order entered against the same Respondent for the same violation. The Respondent brought the property into compliance on 08/25/2012. A fine in the amount of $3,200 is hereby imposed for 32 of repeat violation. Mr. Henson seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Overgrown property, ULDR Section, 3 -10.3 • CE -12 -01342 21 Apple Hill Hollow Mr. Leonard, Code Compliance Officer, gave testimony for the above case. MOTION: Mr. Henson moved to find Respondent(s) in this case in violation of the City Code as charged and that Respondent(s) correct the violation before 1:00 p.m. on 10/04/2012. In the event Respondent does not comply by this date, a fine in the amount of $ 25.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation continues past the aforestated date. The Respondent(s) is /are further ordered to contact the Code Compliance Officer to verify compliance with this Order. I find that the violations constitute a serious threat to the public health, safety and welfare and in the event the Respondent does not correct the violation by the date set in this order, the city commission shall be notified and appropriate action should be taken by the City to bring the property into compliance. The City is entitled to recover its reasonable costs of such services. Mr. Smith seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Designated parking, ULDR Section 3- 10.9(A)(4) ® CE -12 -01387 201 Lake Griffin Cir Mr. Leonard, Code Compliance Officer, gave testimony for the above case. MOTION: Mr. Henson moved to find Respondent(s) in this case in violation of the City Code as charged and that Respondent(s) correct the violation before 1:00 p.m. on 10/04/2012. In the event Respondent does not comply by this date, a fine in the amount of $ 25.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation 8 1 P a g e