Laserfiche WebLink
Officer to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Henson seconded the motion. The motion passed <br />unanimously. <br />No sign permit, City Code Section 3-16.10 <br />® CE-12-00085 1810 SR 436 Repeat violation <br />Mr. Brown, Code Compliance Officer gave testimony for the above case. <br />MOTION: Ms. Hale moved to find Respondent(s) in this case was/were in repeat violation of City Code as <br />charged based on the Board's prior order entered against the same Respondent for the same violation. The <br />Respondent brought the property into compliance on 02/01/2012. A fine in the amount of $150.00 is <br />hereby imposed for 6 of repeat violation. Mr. Herron seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. <br />STANDING ORDERS REQUESTED <br />Designated narking. City Code Section 3-10.9 (Al (4 <br />® CE-11-02822 520 Hibiscus Rd <br />Parking utility trailer s), City Code Section 3-10.9 <br />® CE-11-02838 885 Wolf Trl <br />Parkin ug tility trailer(s), City Code Section 3-10.9 <br />® CE-11-02860 203 Brighton Way <br />Parking in rear yard prohibited, City Code Section 3-10.9(b) <br />® CE-11-02896 234 Wilshire Dr <br />Designated barking. City Code Section 3-10.9 (A) (4 <br />® CE-11-02960 809 Caloosa Trl <br />Parking utility trailer(s), City Code Section 3-10.9 <br />® CE-11-02963 809 Caloosa Trl <br />Parlcin~ in rear yard prohibited, City Code Section 3-10.9(b) <br />® CE-11-03010 809 Caloosa Trl <br />Parkin lg_ar~e vehicles dump trucks, wreckers, City Code Section 3-10.9 A,l,B,4 <br />® CE-12-00004 1143 Helen St <br />Obstructing street or sidewalk, City Code Section 68-108(b) <br />® CE-12-00025 810 Osceola Trl <br />Designated parking, City Code Section 3-10.9 (A) (4) <br />® CE-12-00026 810 Osceola Trl <br />Parlcin~ in rear ward prohibited, City Code Section 3-10.9(b) <br />® CE-12-00086 841 Wolf Trl <br />Mr. Brown, Code Compliance Supervisor, advised the above cases were in compliance by the hearing date. <br />The City requested standing orders for all related cases. <br />MOTION: Mr. Henson moved to find Respondent(s) in this case was/were in violation of City Code as <br />charged and failed to correct the violation by the time specified for correction by the Code Compliance <br />Officer; that the violation is now corrected and no fine imposed. Any violation of the same code by <br />Respondent(s) within FIVE (5) years from the date of this Order shall be treated as a repeat violation, for <br />which a fine of up to $500.00 per day maybe imposed. Ms. Hale seconded the motion. The motion passed <br />unanimously. <br />4~Page <br />