My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes 01/30/2012
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes
>
City Commission Minutes Archives
>
2012 City Commission Minutes
>
CC Minutes 01/30/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 1:13:05 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 12:31:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Special
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
1/30/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Minutes of January 30, 2012 — Special Meeting <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />SERVICES RELATING TO FUNDING OF THE U.S. 17- 92 /S.R. 436 FLYOVER PROJECT; <br />PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE." <br />Interim City Manager Newlon stated that at the last meeting the Commission had discussed the matter of the <br />deferral of the flyover at 17 -92 and 436, as resources have been reallocated to other projects by the State. He <br />noted that the Commission had expressed great concern that the City should do whatever was in its power to <br />try to move that schedule forward again. He stated that the Commission had expressed its desire to seek to <br />engage some professionals to represent the City in Tallahassee to see if progress could be made toward that <br />end, and it was the consensus of the Commission that there was one firm uniquely positioned to provide that <br />service. <br />Mr. Newlon advised that representatives of Florida Strategic Advisors, Inc., Ms. Melanie Chase and Ms. <br />Michelle Ertel were present tonight to answer any questions the Commission may have. He explained that they <br />have submitted a limited term contract for the Commission's consideration, the value of which is <br />approximately $12,000 for four months' service. He added that to the extent costs are incurred, those expenses <br />would be shared on a pro rata basis with any other clients they may be representing simultaneously. <br />Mr. Newlon explained that this type of procurement is not the normal process, but due to the urgency of the <br />matter and the unique position of these consultants, this matter is being brought forward tonight for the <br />Commission's consideration. He added that normally there would be a purchasing process involving <br />prospective vendors, but in this case what is being considered is a sole source contract. He again stressed that <br />this is unique and not normal business for the City, but it is due to the urgency of the matter. <br />Ms. Melanie Chase addressed the Commission and explained that the reason for the urgency is that they are <br />looking to have the Legislature add some money into their budget to help with the project. She noted that she <br />does not believe they will be able to bring $25 million out of this session to get the flyover built, but if they are <br />unable to get a line item for Casselberry into this budget, the fear is that the project will fall off everyone's <br />radar and it is not currently in DOT's five year plan. She advised that the legislative session is about halfway <br />through, and the budgeting process is a little less than halfway, but she believes they can still get this in. She <br />stated that local legislators are concerned about this and the City has their attention and that is why it is being <br />submitted to the Commission at this time. <br />Discussion: Discussion ensued regarding options the City may have for development of the intersection if the <br />flyover is not built, and also the possibility of alternative funding for the project. <br />Audience Input: The following individual came forward: <br />Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, expressed his opinion that it was a good <br />idea to hire a consultant or lobbyist, but did not feel it should be an exclusive relationship and <br />that the City should keep options open to hear information from others. He also voiced <br />concerns about the possibility of the Wekiva Parkway project pulling fiends away from other <br />projects. <br />No one else came forward. <br />MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to approve Resolution 12- 2341, as presented. <br />Motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Hufford. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.