My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CEB 11/03/2011 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Code Enforcement Hearing Minutes
>
CEB Minutes Archives
>
2011 CEB Minutes
>
CEB 11/03/2011 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2012 6:49:24 PM
Creation date
2/7/2012 6:49:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
11/3/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Christian Bass, 17 Jackson Ct, stated he has been living at this location for over 10 years. Mr. Bass stated <br />his vehicle was one of the cleanest and newest on the block and no one has issues with it. He then stated <br />in numerous cases when laws like this have been passed of this nature there have been grandfather <br />clause put in place. <br />MOTION: Mr. Herron moved to find Respondent(s) in this case in violation of the City Code as charged <br />and that Respondent(s) correct the violation before 1:00 p.m. on 12/06/2011. In the event Respondent <br />does not comply by this date, a fine in the amount of $25.00 per day will be imposed for each day the <br />violation continues past the aforestated date. The Respondent(s) is/are further ordered to contact the <br />Code Compliance Officer to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Henson seconded the motion. The <br />motion passed unanimously. <br />Overgrown Property, City Code Section 70-2(C) <br />® CE-11-02348 1965 Cree Trl <br />Ms. Broman, Code Compliance Officer, gave testimony for the above case. <br />MOTION: Ms. Hale moved to find Respondent in this case in violation of the City Code as charged and <br />that Respondent correct the violation before 1:00 p.m. on 11/17/2011. In the event Respondent does not <br />comply by this date, a fine in the amount of $ 25.00 per day will be imposed for each day the violation <br />continues past the aforestated date. The Respondent is further ordered to contact the Code Compliance <br />Officer to verify compliance with this Order. Mr. Henson seconded the motion. The motion passed <br />unanimously. <br />Boat(s)/trailers, City Code Section 3-10.9 (2) <br />® CE-11-02401 851 N Triplet Lake Dr <br />Mr. Rivera, Code Compliance Officer, gave testimony for the above case. He then stated this case was <br />found in compliance earlier in the day and a Standing Order was being requested. <br />MOTION: Ms. Hale moved to find Respondent(s) in this case was/were in violation of City Code as <br />charged and failed to correct the violation by the time specified for correction by the Code Compliance <br />Officer; that the violation is now corrected and no fine imposed. Any violation of the same code by <br />Respondent(s) within FIVE (5) years from the date of this Order shall be treated as a repeat violation, for <br />which a fine of up to $500.00 per day may be imposed. Mr. Herron seconded the motion. The motion <br />passed unanimously. <br />Trash & debris, City Code Section 70-2(C) <br />® CE-11-02459 1395 Lake Dr/ repeat violation <br />Unsafe residential building, Standard Housing Code 103.2.1 <br />® CE-11-02460 1395 Lake Dr <br />Ms. Broman, Code Compliance Officer, gave testimony for the above case. Ms. Broman provided <br />documentation from the Building Inspector that made the determination the building was unsafe. <br />MOTION: Ms. Hale moved to find Respondents in these cases in violation of the City Code as charged <br />and that Respondents correct the violations before 1:00 p.m. on 11/17/2011. In the event Respondent <br />does not comply by this date, a fine in the amount of $100.00 per case per day will be imposed for each <br />day the violations continue past the aforestated date. The Respondents are further ordered to contact the <br />Code Compliance Officer to verify compliance with this Order. I find that the violations constitute a serious <br />threat to the public health, safety and welfare and in the event the Respondent does not correct the <br />violation by the date set in this order, the city commission shall be notified and appropriate action should <br />be taken by the City to bring the property into compliance. The City is entitled to recover its reasonable <br />costs of such services. Mr. Smith seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. <br />S~Pat;e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.