My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PZ 08/11/2010 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Minutes
>
Advisory Board Minutes
>
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
>
P & Z Minutes Archives
>
2010 P & Z Minutes
>
PZ 08/11/2010 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2010 9:03:47 AM
Creation date
9/13/2010 9:03:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Meeting Type
Regular
City Clerk - Doc Type
Minutes
City Clerk - Date
8/11/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Commissionl <br />Local Planning Agency <br />August 11, 2010 <br />Page 4 <br />the property while the tree company was working on the property and questioned the foreman regarding the work <br />being done and left the site. He said the tree company worked on the site for 5 days. He said he was satisfied with <br />the work and paid the tree company. Mr. Anderson said a neighbor called Code Enforcement and said that live <br />trees were being cut down on the site, He said two arborists have stated that the trees were dead. <br />He said shortly after the work was done on his property, he received code violations for clearing his property <br />without a permit and eventually said that he needed a permit and he needed to replace the trees. He said the Code <br />Enforcement Officer could have prevented this had she asked for a permit, He said he wouldn't be in this situation <br />because he would have found out about the tree replacement requirements and the trees would still be there. He <br />said the trees were contributing absolutely nothing to this planet and were dead and dangerous. <br />Mr. Anderson apologized and regrets getting himself into this situation. He said he made a mistake by <br />putting his trust in a large local tree company that should know the codes. He said in his business if a permit is not <br />obtained for doing work the contractor is punished. Mr. Anderson said that the tree company committed the crime <br />and he has to pay. He said if the tree companies were held accountable and had to pay fines this kind of thing may <br />not happen. <br />He said that he paid $4,000 due to safety concerns. He said if he let the trees fall on their own he didn't <br />know what kind of damage it would do but he wouldn't have to pay into the tree bank fund. <br />Mr. Anderson requested the Commission waive the funds due to the circumstances. He said this would <br />devastate his family and ruin any chances he has to make it through this tough time. <br />Mr. Parkhurst asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition <br />to, the request. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. <br />Casselberry said that Seminole County takes aerial photographs and he thought the photos could help document the <br />condition of the trees. <br />In response to the Commission's question regarding the tree replacement policy that was used during the <br />2004 hurricane, Ms. Smith stated she was not privy to any trees that fell on commercial sites. A general discussion <br />ensued regarding permitting of tree removal during emergency situations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.