My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-2148 Local Mitigation Strategy Update
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Resolutions
>
Resolutions Archives
>
2010 Resolutions
>
10-2148 Local Mitigation Strategy Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2010 11:10:35 AM
Creation date
7/30/2010 11:09:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Doc Type
Press Releases
Doc Number
10-2148
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Seminole County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) <br />Ills irk s n <br />4 <br />The technical planning process begins with hazard identification. In this process, the <br />LMS Working Group and representatives of individual jurisdictions identify all of the <br />natural, technological and human-caused hazards that could threaten the community. <br />When the hazard types are identified as relevant to, or of concern for, that jurisdiction, <br />the participants can make an estimate of the risk each poses to the jurisdiction being <br />evaluated. This section details the natural, technological and human caused hazards to <br />which Seminole County is vulnerable. <br />The Seminole County LMS Task Force has incorporated hazard history that was <br />accurately available. In the future the LMS Task Force will incorporate continued hazard <br />history for inclusion in this LMS. The identified hazards have remained consistent from <br />the 2004 Seminole County LMS. <br />Vulnerability and Impact Scales <br />Each hazard described in this section is ranked by level of vulnerability based on <br />probability of occurrence or actual occurrence, and degree of severity or magnitude <br />(consequences of impact). The scales are defined below: <br />Vulnerability Scale <br />• None =Although the hazard is noted, no previous occurrence has been <br />recorded and the hazard is considered no threat to the jurisdiction. <br />• Minimal = Some potential for the hazard exists, but no previous <br />occurrences have been recorded. <br />• Moderate =Potential for the hazard exists and previous occurrences <br />have been fairly infrequent. <br />• High =Strong potential for the hazard to occur, and previous occurrence <br />have been frequent. <br />Extent Scale <br />• Minimal = No extent or consequence have been documented in the <br />jurisdiction; or, if so, it has been localized and short-term (less than 24 <br />hours). <br />• Minor =Hazard extent has been or has the potential to be relatively <br />localized and short-term (less than 72 hours) <br />• Moderate =Hazard extent has been or has the potential to impact <br />multiple geographic areas on a short- to mid-term basis (72 -96 hours), <br />and cause disruption in several community indicators (communications, <br />transportation, medical services, etc.) <br />• Major =Hazard has impacted or has the potential to impact widespread <br />geographic areas on a long-term basis (more than 96 hours) and cause <br />widespread disruption of community indicators. <br />Page 9 <br />5~,1~;, ~i l l t 7Cli~'7~)'' <br />~. ,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.