PZ 05/26/2010 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zoning Commissionl Local Planning Agency May 26, 2010 Page 2 Mr. John Sabin, 310 Concord Drive, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Sabin stated he was aware that the various types of (zoning) designations provided for the Commercial designation would limit the intensity of the uses, although he would prefer that the neighborhood remain residential. Ne also stated his concern that changing the code "administratively" would allow staff to easily change the code back "administratively". Ms. Smith clarified that the term in the property owner notification letter stating that "administratively amending" the code meant that the applicant is the City, not a private individual. She further stated that, as with any change to the Code, three public hearings are required to change the Code. Mr. Parkhurst asked for a motion to address LPA 10-02. Mr. Aramendia recommended continuance of LPA 10-02 to the June 23, 2010 meeting. Mr. Bakalla seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. Fourth Item of Business: LPA 1006: ULDR MTMU• Table 2.4 2 and 2.8 (non conformities Amending the Unified Land Development Regulations to allow the continuation of structures and uses after significant fire or storm damage based on the properties zoning and future land use designation prior to receiving an MTMU flu designation. Ms. Sandra Smith, Chief Planner, reviewed the information provided in her memorandum dated May 26, 2010, to the City of Casselberry Planning and Zoning Commission (a copy is on file in the Community Development Department). She stated that this action amended the Code in two locations to address the concerns of those property owners whose properties were receiving a future land use map amendment to Major Thoroughfare Mixed- Use (MTMU), After a brief discussion, Mr. Parkhurst asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the request. Mr. John Casselberry, 700 South Lost Lake Lane, Casselberry, Florida came forward. Mr. Casselberry stated that the eighteen month limitation to obtain a building permit would not be enough time for those who may have to litigate with their insurance company, especially should they need a legal appeal. He suggested an exception to those in litigation. Mr. Parkhurst asked for a motion to address LPA 10-06. Mr. Aramendia recommended approval of LPA 10- 06 to the City Commission based on the staff report for LPA 10-06 dated May 26, 2010 from Ms. Smith to the