CEB Minutes 03/11/2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF CASSELBERRY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MARCH 1 I , 2010, page 4 1n CEB Case #10-00004, Parrl L, McKerrrarr rrrade a rnotiorr to firrcl Respondent(s) was/fvere in violation of City Code, Section 70-2 {C), prrr•suarrt to the Board's original Order of 01/06/2010 (should have beery 0911612005). A fine in the arrrount of X2,100.00 is hereby unposed for 21 of repeat violation (and the cost of abatement). David Herrsorr seconded the motion. The motion passes arraninrously. CE-10-OOpSS Roof fftrrinte~rrrtace 305.3 (SHC 1994) U S Brrrt„k Nntlojral Associrrtiorr Vs, Aldei•f~rrrrl ,~.., 331 ICtrjafoj• Blvd Marle~re Brorraan, Code Euforcernent Ofbcer gave testi~tiony for the above case. Noel Sruifh made a rrrotion to find Respondent(s) irr CLB Case #ID-00055 irr viol~rtiorr of City Code, Section 305.3 (SHC 1994), and that Rcsponclerrt(s) correct the violation before 1:00 p.m. 0312512010. Another hearing -vill be held before this Board on 0 410 812 0 1 0 to determine conrpliarrce by the afor•estated date, and, if there is no compliance by the afores#atecl date, a fine in the anrourrt of 525.00 per• day -vill be inrposecl for each and every day the violation continues past the aforestated date. The Respondent(s) is/are further ordered to contact the Code Inspector to verify compliance with this Order. David Henson seconded the rrrotion. The motion passes rrnarrirrrorrsly. CE-IQ-D029S Pni•kist~_Iar;~e vellicleT3-10.9 A,I,B,4 -•euerrt violrrtr'o~t Sfrrirley/oiv~ter• 6761V Wiil~er Pnf•k Dr Luis Rivera, Code Er~forcenre~it Officer gave testi~rrony for the above case. Orr 12/1012009 a sta~~ditlg order was issued r~~alci~~g ar~y fixture violations a repeat violaliorr. In CLB Case #10-00295, Paul L. McKernan rnacle a rrrotion to find Respondent(s) vas/were irr violation of City Code; Section 3-10.9 A,1,B,4 prrrsuarrt to the Board's original Order of 1 211 512 0 0 9 {should have been 0 911 612 0 0 8). A fine in the amount of X800.00 is herebyrrnposed far- 8 of repeat violation. Kathleen A. Hale seconded the rrrotion. The motion passes unarrirnously.