Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CASSELBERRY CITY COMMISSION <br />Miuutes of January 12, 20119 - Regular Meeting <br />Page 24 of 32 <br /> <br />1 RESOLUTIONS <br /> <br /> <br />were <br /> <br />OTHER ITEMS <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />on the <br />City Commission shall be to certiorari of the documents, <br />constituting record upon which the Planning <br />Ms. Reischmann stated this appeal been made a public sense that <br />who wish to speak may do so as provided under ULDR Section 1-2.6 however <br />solely to the and goes the should not be <br />Commission. Ms. Reischmann that she was the City <br />not have an Ms. Reischmann <br />is the Planning Commission's decision on November 2008 <br />mitigation issue, and any orders to Holdings are final and cannot <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />be <br /> <br />Presentation: <br />and gave a <br />November 2008 Planning and <br />property is located at the <br />Lally's notice of appeal <br /> <br /> <br />9, <br /> <br />Presentation: Ms. Smith, <br />process and action taken by the Planning and <br />materials to the City Commission. <br />November 2008 Planning <br />staff's and <br />6, 2008 with the minutes the 12, 2008 <br />the verbatim record ofthe meeting provided within <br />appellant's notice of appeal dated 9,2008, <br />Commission. Ms. was not in attendance at the <br />meeting. Ms. Lally new information in <br />record when the Planning Commission decision on <br />specifically Exhibits Hand K was new information not <br />Commission, and should not be considered the Commission because it <br />a certiorari review. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />came forward and gave an ofthe <br />Commission on this as outlined in the agenda <br />review documents tor the certiorari <br />November 12, 2008 <br />Commission <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ora <br />2008. It was noted <br />the and <br />was scope <br />