Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WHEREAS, in the absence of this Interlocal Agreement the CITY would be <br />forced to consider repealing the CITY's currently existing separation requirements for <br />adult entertainment, which separation requirements protect both COUNTY and CITY <br />residents; and <br />WHEREAS, in the absence of this Interlocal Agreement, the CITY would be <br />forced to consider allowing adult uses in the few industrial zones located in the CITY, <br />and due to the primarily residential nature of the CITY, these industrial zones are <br />located directly adjacent to residential areas, creating a great deal of concern among <br />the nearby residents; and <br />WHEREAS, the CITY and the COUNTY constitute the same relevant market for <br />the adult entertainment businesses; and <br />WHEREAS, there have been no applications filed for new adult entertainment <br />locations in the CITY in over six (6) years; and <br />WHEREAS, in Boss Capital v. City of Casselberry, 6:96-cv-463-0rl-22DAB, U.S <br />District Court, Middle District, Order dated January 31, 2002, the Court found it is <br />difficult to tell where the Casselberry City limits begin and end, and that adult <br />entertainment businesses located outside the City provide adequate opportunities for <br />adult expression, and that the City's existing sites were well within accepted limits for <br />adult entertainment sites based on the City's size and primarily residential nature; and <br />WHEREAS, the sites identified in this Interlocal Agreement are also well within <br />acceptable limits and provide reasonable alternative avenues of expression; and <br />WHEREAS, it is beneficial to the public for local governments to work together in <br /> <br />2 <br />