My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-1703 Commission Meeting & Agenda Policies Amendments
Laserfiche
>
City Clerk's Public Records
>
Resolutions
>
Resolutions Archives
>
2006 Resolutions
>
06-1703 Commission Meeting & Agenda Policies Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2008 2:34:17 PM
Creation date
9/10/2008 2:34:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Doc Type
Resolutions
City Clerk - Date
8/26/2006
Doc Number
06-1703
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CUTTING OFF DEBATE <br /> <br />I. Most discussions should not be cut off until each Commissioner has had a full <br />opportunity to offer opinion and reasoning related to the issue being discussed. <br />2. However, if a Commissioner submits a motion to limit or end the debate, which is <br />seconded, it should be voted upon separately. If the motion to end or limit debate is <br />approved, the Commission shall then vote on the original motion that was the <br />subject of debate. <br /> <br />APPEAL OF A PROCEDURAL DECISION OF THE MAYOR <br /> <br />1. Purpose is to disagree with a procedural ruling of the Mayor and allow the <br />Commission to decide the disagreement by taking a vote. <br />2. The motion to appeal requires a second, and must be made at the time the ruling <br />was made by the Mayor. <br />3. The motion is debatable by the Commission. <br />4. The question to be decided is whether to sustain the Mayor's ruling. A majority or <br />tie vote sustains the decision of the Mayor. <br /> <br />MAYOR'S (AS PRESIDING OFFICER) ROLE DURING DEBATE <br /> <br />1. The Mayor has the responsibility of keeping the discussion on point with the subject <br />being considered remaining mindful oftime afforded the discussion. <br />2. The Mayor shall maintain order during the discussion assuring that each member of <br />the Commission and the City Manager are allotted appropriate opportunity for input <br />and rebuttal and that interruption of the speakers does not occur. <br />3. At the appropriate time after the debate concludes, the Mayor may attempt to <br />summarize the motion before the Commission and seek clarification from <br />Commissioners if any issues related to the discussion remain in doubt. <br />4. When it appears that all Commissioners that wish to speak have done so, the Mayor <br />may inquire if there is a desire for further discussion. If so, the discussion may <br />continue. If not, the question is put to a vote. <br /> <br />METHODS OF VOTING <br /> <br />I. Voice Vote (Commissioners respond with a yes vote to a request from the Mayor as <br />to those in favor of a particular motion under consideration.) <br />2. Roll Call (when required or requested, the City Clerk will call the roll of <br />Commissioners present seeking a yes or no response to the motion under <br />consideration. ) <br />a. The City Clerk will commence roll call starting with Seat #1 and calling the <br />next seat numbers consecutively until all members of the Commission have <br />been called. The City Clerk will always call upon the Vice Mayor and <br />Mayor, respectively, last in the voting sequence. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.