CEB Minutes 05-08-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF CASSELBERRY CODE ENFORCENIENT BOARD NIEETING MAY 08, 2008 PAGE 3 Ms. Babb-Nutcher asked what this has to do with Mr. Pieski not obtaining a Building Pennit. Dr. Brock stated that technically this had nothing to do with that. He thcn stated that on 05/05/2008 ]\11r. Pieski stated he wanted to go thru with the appeals process. Dr. Brock discussed this with staff' and it was detennined this would go straight to City Commission; the next available meeting is 06/09/2008. Ms. Babb-Nutcher asked if Mr. Picski has so many days to appeal the decision. Dr. Brock statcd in the code it does not say. . Brock continued. Discussion. Dr. Brock stated Mr. Pieski has initiated the appeals process; this will be placed on the City Commission agenda for 06/09/2008. Discussion. Richard L. Henderson asked if the June date was in place of May 13,2008. Discussion. Dr. Brock stated the May 13th date is the date Mr. Pieski needed to indicate to his decision. Mr. Pieski has already done this as of 05/05/2008. City 'vvhether he wished to appeal Robert C. Flint asked about a statement Dr. Brock has made, this case is no Building Pemlit, howevcr Dr. Brock stated that Mr. Pieski did apply for a pel1nit but it was not in accordance. Dr. Brock stated there are two different divisions, apparently the Building Pel111it had never been applied tor, but did apply for a Construction Pem1it with Public Works last May. There are two separate processes in the City, essentially a Construction Pem1it has to do with site work and a Building Pennit has to do with vel1ical construction, some municipalities may require both for a sea wall. Mr. Henderson asked so he is going to go t/uu the appeals proccss. Dr. Brock stated yes, and, that if you were to tollow the time line in the letter written to the CEB, at that on 06/09/2008 the City Commission will decide whether to grant the variance or not. Dr. Brock continued. Discussion. Ms. Babb-Nutcher asked ifthere was any specific agreement regarding the Code Board Order that has already been imposed or was there any suggestion that the Order would not go forward or not record the Order ifhe comes into compliance with all Dr. Brock's dates. Dr. Brock stated no. Mr. Brown stated there was no agreement, but there was a request that the fine be suspended pending the outcome of the appeal.