Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Discussion <br /> <br />Flashing, Intermittent, or Moving Lights <br /> <br />On July 17,1996, the FHWA sued a memorandum cl3rtfylng <br />the 6tltus of "changeable mes6age 6.IgllS.' It ooted that many <br />St:lte-Fedecal agreements \fl)uld allo\~ for changeable me&- <br />s:ages &uch as the Trl-V1s1on slgns that use routlng pmeIs or <br />slat&. Howel'eJ; It also noted that, el'en lfTrI-V1s10n 6lgns <br />"'ell! allowed, the agreement probably wouldm alloW' LED <br />61gnl. "In ne:ltly all SUtes, these signs may stlU not contaIn <br />fhshlng, Intermittent, or movtng llghts,..the memo states. <br /> <br />A 2006 letter to 1&33 DEplItment ofTr:uEp:>rt3tlon officWs <br />goes even funher. If the 6Ute agll!ement prohibits 61gns <br />"Wumln:lted b}' any fl,,,"i,,!> inftrmintfl/ '" ,,>>fling light or <br />lJghtB...lnclud1ng any f}pe of screoen using anImated or a:roll- <br />log dlEpJaya, &uch as LED Q.1ght~mJttIng dIode) screen oc any <br />other type of video lfrpIay, ~ if ~ '1faWC' is <tati_or]: <br />then "the wordIng In the agreement c:Ieacly prohibits 6uch <br />6lgns,"1t states. <br /> <br />. A 1998 FffiVA memo noted that digital signs raise "significant bigb- <br />way safety qlll'stiom buause of tlu potential to be ,'xtremel)' brigbt, <br />rapidly cbanging, and distracting to motorists." <br /> <br />. A 2001 FH\i\TA review of billboard safet)' smdies found that "tbe safety <br />consequences of distraction from tbe dri'(Jing task can be profound." <br /> <br />. A 2003 report titled External-To-Vehicle Driver Distraction, by the <br />Development Department Research Programme in Scotland, found <br />that "there is overwhelming evidence that advertisements and sigm <br />placed near junctions can function as distracters, and that ibis con- <br />stitutes a major tbreat to road safet)'." It filrther noted that, "Young <br />(aged 17-21) drivers are particularly prone to external-to-vehicle <br />driver distraction." <br /> <br />The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/ <br />Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic <br />Driving Study Data <br /> <br />ApriI2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, <br />U.S. Dtpartment o[Transportation <br /> <br />A major study of driver inattention, primarily involving distractions inside <br />the car, but finding that any distraction of more than two seconds is a poten- <br />tial cause of crashes and near crashes. <br /> <br />Traffic Safety Evaluation of Video Advertising Signs <br /> <br />Transportation Reseasch Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, <br />No. 1937, 2005 <br /> <br />A study of electronic signs in Toronto, which finds that "On the basis of <br />the eye fixation study and the pubic survey data, it is apparent that video <br />advertising can distract drivers inappropriately and lead to individual <br />crashes," but calls for additional research due to other conflicting data. <br /> <br />UNo empirical studies are necessary for reasonahle <br />people to conclude that hillhoards pose a traffic <br />hazard, since hy their very nature they are <br />designed to distract drivers and their passengers <br />from maintaining their view of the road" <br />